Dear members,

As we close out an intense and historic year for CUPE 3912, I want to take a moment to thank you—for your courage, your solidarity, and your commitment to one another.

The past year demanded a great deal from all of us. Across campuses, bargaining became increasingly difficult, employers resisted fair solutions, and many of you stepped into organizing, mobilization, and strike action for the first time. Through phone zaps, picket lines, postering campaigns, rallies, and daily conversations with colleagues, members showed up in extraordinary ways. The strength of our strike votes and the resolve on the lines sent a clear message: quality education depends on fair working conditions.

One of the most powerful lessons of this strike was the importance of communication and community. Our daily strike newsletter, media work, and member-led storytelling helped build trust, counter employer misinformation, and keep us connected during an incredibly challenging time. Just as importantly, many members told me that the relationships built on the picket lines were a highlight—proof that while employers don’t create community for us, we absolutely can and do.

As we move into the wrap-up phase, we’ve begun debrief sessions at SMU and MSVU, using an “apples and onions” reflection to talk honestly about what worked and what didn’t. While some members understandably felt stretched thin, I was encouraged by how many people spoke about solidarity, confidence, and connection. These reflections will shape how we strengthen our committees, build more capacity, and prepare for future bargaining.

Looking ahead, there is important work underway. We are continuing organizing efforts to grow the local, including bringing Dalhousie architects into the bargaining unit. Labour-management discussions are resuming, with commitments already secured around student evaluations at MSVU and an upcoming LMC with Dalhousie in early 2026. I am also committed to ensuring that retro pay is never again used as a bargaining delay tactic that costs members money.

Finally, after everything you’ve given this year, I want us to celebrate. I hope to establish a local-wide social committee and plan an event in early January so we can come together, reconnect, and recognize the strength and resolve of this membership. If you’re interested in helping with that—or in getting more involved in any aspect of the local—please reach out.

This year showed what CUPE 3912 is capable of. Together, we shifted the conversation about precarious academic work in Nova Scotia, strengthened our union, and demonstrated the power of collective action. I am deeply proud to stand with you.

In solidarity,
Lauren McKenzie
President, CUPE 3912

Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives Gala – Report
Andrew Maize, NSCAD CUPE 3912, Bargaining Committee

I attended the CCPA Gala on November 6th as a delegate for CUPE 3912. I took a cab over to  the event with my driver Muhammad. It being 5:30, we leapt into discussion around the  everyone second favourite conversation topic – Halifax Traffic. He told me some nightmarish and  frustrating scenarios – and we agreed that it appears that the the city has no plan, and that the  proposed band-aid solutions (removing bike lanes WTF? and removing trees and houses on  Robie were not only insulting but useless. We discussed mass-transit options and limiting private  vehicle traffic on the peninsula. We caught the rising of the near full beaver moon while crossing  the new bridge. 

In the beer line, I spoke with two members of the Faculty Union at Saint Mary’s University, and  they spoke of solidarity with the then striking members of our local. I sat at the table with other  CUPE members, including the President of CUPE Nova Scotia. I introduced myself and  everyone was pleasant. I learned about how my fellow members got into working with the union  (a free meal was a common thread). I learned how busy everyone has been with all of the strikes  going on. We were seated in the front row, and I realized that we were head table once we got  called to the buffet FIRST! The menu was tuscan chicken, a nice sauce, with rice (or was it  potato?), veggies and a roll with butter. There were two types of salad, once with goat cheese,  and the other a caesar with bacon on the side. For dessert there we cookies and baked goods. 

We heard from all of the important projects and undertakings by Christine Saulnier, Director of  the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives-Nova Scotia. She spoke about their policy research  initiatives on housing, childcare, and advocacy for living wages standards for works in the  maritimes. The main speaker at the event was Leilani Farha, from her online bio “the former UN  Special Rapporteur on the Right to Housing and Global Director of The Shift. Her work is  animated by the principle that housing is a social good, not a commodity. Leilani has helped  develop global human rights standards on the right to housing, including through her topical  reports on homelessness, the financialization of housing, informal settlements, rights-based  housing strategies, and the first UN Guidelines for the implementation of the right to housing.  She is the central character in the documentary PUSH regarding the financialization of housing,  screening around the world. Leilani Launched The Shift in 2017 with the UN Office of the High  Commissioner for Human Rights and United Cities and Local Government.” The format of the  talk was an Q and A with a journalist, but unfortunately was only about 20mins long, and the  questions were surface level and didn’t really go very deep into things. This was a shame  because Farha is a deeply knowledgable researcher on the housing crisis, and I think would have  had much more to offer on such a important matter. 

The event was an great introduction to her work and I look forward to learning more about these  initiatives. My participation also introduced me to other Union and progressive organizations  such as Fernwood Publishing, which I learned a lot about in the evening. Overall, my  participation allowed me to represent CUPE 3912 at a very visible event, and meet lots of people  in the community. These conversations and relationship will continue to benefit us as we work  towards our first collective agreement with NSCAD. 

Thanks for reading. 

My involvement with virtual picketing was limited to those times when in-person picketing was cancelled or delayed due to weather. Therefore, my experience is limited in comparison with those who relied more extensively or completely on virtual picketing opportunities.

Having stated that, from my perspective virtual picketing worked extremely well. For those members who were periodically unable or never able to participate in in-person picketing this method was essential to their ability to participate in the strike and to collect strike pay. For those like me who carried out in-person picketing as often as possible, virtual picketing proved most helpful in making up time lost on in-person picketing due to weather or personal factors (such as family responsibilities, appointments, etc.). If we were to go on strike in future, I would be very disappointed if a virtual picketing option was not available.

In terms of the process itself, once I was logged on to each Zoom session it went quite smoothly for me. Online picket captains did an excellent job of welcoming us, explaining procedures, and assisting newcomers to the process. The linked task lists that were provided to members were very helpful. I could see what tasks were available and which of those were prioritized by the union. I especially appreciated the flexibility to work on some tasks that may not have been listed specifically but which were along similar lines to those that were. In my case, these activities were cleared with the picket captains.

Again, my more limited experiences with the process make it harder for me to offer much in the way of substantive constructive criticism. The one issue that I can think of involves accessing the Zoom sessions themselves. I did find it a bit awkward searching through various emails for the Zoom links (sometimes having to go back through several days of email to find those links). 

Perhaps there could be a clearly labelled section on CUPE’s website for virtual strike activities where Zoom links for each university could be posted. Such a section of the website could be password protected so that non union members could not view or enter it. Aside from presenting the Zoom links themselves, such a section of the website could also serve as a central point of access to information on eligibility for participation in virtual picketing, scheduling of virtual picketing activities, and other information. This might be helpful for everyone, and especially to those like me who engaged in virtual picketing on an infrequent basis. If such links did exist on CUPE’s website, my apologies for overlooking them.

An alternative to providing a dedicated page on CUPE’s website for virtual strike duties could be to include Zoom links and the online picketing schedule in each email update from leadership, perhaps toward the end of each update or message. That way, we would only ever have to look at the last communication from leadership for virtual picketing information and Zoom links for each school. This method might also ensure that we are viewing the most up to date information about virtual picketing, as during the final week of the strike some of the original picketing plans were changed as the situation developed (although these changes seemed to affect in-person picketing more than virtual picketing).

If I understood the situation correctly, in the earlier stages of the strike Zoom links for virtual picketing were shared only with those members who were signed up for online strike duties. This was done to encourage any and all members who could potentially picket in person to do so. If this is correct, then I understand entirely why that approach was taken (so as to maximize numbers on the in-person picket lines and minimize the degrees to which some might take advantage of, or even abuse, the virtual picketing option). I have to admit, however, that during the strike I don’t recall anyone complaining about, or even mentioning, any awareness of abuse of the virtual picketing option. If that perception accurately reflects the situation, then it’s an excellent comment on the honesty and dedication of our union membership.

As time went on, and after a couple of sessions when virtual picketing was opened up to all members due to the delay or cancellation of in-person picketing, there seemed to be a transition toward all members having access to the Zoom links for each school. At that point, the kinds of measures suggested above (for easier access to Zoom links and virtual picket scheduling) might have been taken. 

Although the volume of description above may make it appear as if I’m harping on the issue of access to information about and Zoom links for virtual picketing, I’m really not. At the end of the day, I was always able to get the information and the links that I needed after some searching through emails and other communications. These suggestions are made only in a spirit of support and gratitude for all of the hard work undertaken by our leadership team, including online picket captains and all those who made virtual picketing a successful reality. I think it was a great asset to the strike and hope that it will remain a part of our union’s “toolkit” moving forward.

Below, I have written out a guide for “back-to-work”. I wrote the text and asked Gemini (an AI-driven tool) to put my text into a guide that would be easy to read (i.e., it created headings and subheadings).

Once a faculty strike ends, the challenge of “back-to-work” begins. Returning to the classroom after a strike requires strategic planning and empathy. We need to be realistic about our own capacity for work while ensuring fairness and transparency for our students. The goal is to finish the semester strong without rushing or compromising core learning objectives. While the university should have additional guidelines about what remediation looks like, the information below can serve as a starting point so you can begin to think about what aspects of your course you may need to adapt and how best to do so.

1. Reassessing Course Content

When adjusting content, remember that students tend to be critical of just dropping material as they feel they are learning less. We need to focus on what is truly necessary for them to succeed going forward.

• Prioritize Core Competencies: Be mindful of what is necessary for students to know when they leave the course. Peripheral topics are more easily dropped than core competencies.
• Condense, Don’t Just Drop: It may be preferable to keep all the chapters but cover less in each rather than completely dropping a single chapter; however, it may also work better to simply drop a chapter and then be able to go into the normal amount of detail on the remaining chapters.
• Balance Instructional Methods: If you normally include both lecture AND active learning parts of your course, consider whether you can skip either the lecture or the active learning component for certain topics to save time. However, it’s definitely better to cover less material well than to rush through more material poorly.
• Leverage External and Recorded Content:
  • Record a lecture or two about material you missed that you don’t want to drop completely but also don’t have time to still lecture on. A 20–30 minute video of the “highlights” would be great, with an emphasis on material that is important for the final exam or for subsequent chapters.
  • Look for a high-quality video or article that may cover the same content (e.g., a good documentary, TED talk, or resource provided by the textbook publisher) that you could more easily assign to your students to watch or read.
• Offer Optional Support: Consider holding optional office hours (online or in person) that students can either drop in or sign up to attend. For example, if you had to drop some active learning components from your classes, offer to go through some of those during these optional sessions. While not many students may take you up on that offer, some may find it helpful.

2. Revising Assessment and Grading Schemes

When managing assignments, be realistic about what students can actually accomplish in a condensed format and how much grading you can realistically fit into the time remaining.

• Stagger Deadlines: Extending all deadlines may create too much difficulty if you have to grade a lot of things at once. It’s still a good idea to extend deadlines where you can (especially for auto-graded components like multiple choice quizzes based on chapters), but be mindful of the impact of having them all due, say, the last day of class.
• Focus on Summative Work: Consider dropping formative assignments (i.e., work that is mostly for student practice and reflection, like journals or short quizzes) and focusing on summative ones (i.e., assignments that are crucial to demonstrate knowledge learned). Prioritize summative over formative.
• Reduce Quantity of Assessments: If you had students complete several of one type of assessment (e.g., chapter quizzes, discussion board posts), consider reducing the number that are considered for the final grade. For example, instead of having 8 of 12 podcast reflection grades count, have 6 of 12.
• Respect Completed Work: You could also just say the assignments that would have been due during the strike will not be due anymore. However, be mindful that some students will have continued to complete assignments or submit work during the strike. They may be resentful if they worked hard only to have that work removed or dropped.
• Reweighting for Fairness: Reweight the course so that assessments from before the strike are worth more. For example, if you had a midterm and a final exam and the former was worth less than the latter, maybe swap that. Put more weight on what students completed under “ideal” circumstances and less on what they completed under the post-strike conditions, which are not ideal.

3. Adjusting the Final Exam Format

The final exam should reflect what students were actually able to learn under these compressed conditions, not what they might have memorized under normal circumstances.

• Alter the Format: Consider altering the format of the final exam, especially if it involves a lot of memorizing of content that is now being delivered in a condensed amount of time.
• Reduce Stress: Consider having fewer questions on the final exam, some element of choice (i.e., choose two of the following three questions to answer), or allowing students to bring in a notes sheet (e.g., a single sheet of paper, or an index card) to help reduce the stress of having to remember information they didn’t have as much time to learn in class.

4. Giving Students Agency

Research shows that many students said that the most important part of re-starting classes was having a say in what the rest of the semester would look like.

• Seek Input First: In one study, around 60% of students who experienced a strike would have appreciated either (a) their professor leading a class discussion and then letting the students vote on how to adjust the syllabus or (b) being able to choose an individualized plan (perhaps from two or three possible options) that worked best for them. You may want to ask them open-ended questions in a short quiz or open up a discussion in class when you get back. Questions like:
  • “Before you vote on my proposed remediation or give me any suggestions for alternate plans, please share anything you’d like me to know about your experience of the strike or how it impacted you. This is NOT required and you can certainly skip answering it.”
  • “Is there anything else you’d like to ask me about the strike or about how to finish out the semester now that the strike is over?”
• Propose and Vote: You may want to propose changes for each aspect of your syllabus (e.g., class content, chapter quizzes, assignments, presentations, projects, final exam) and then have students vote on whether they approve of your proposed suggestions or not. This would let you know that, for example, 85% of students are in favour of extending deadlines for chapter quizzes but only 40% are comfortable with dropping a chapter, which could help you adjust your remediation plan.
• Offer Flexible Grading Schemes: You could also have several grading schemes that students can “choose” from and then use the grading scheme for them that results in the highest grade. This lets students take a more targeted approach to their remaining few weeks and gives them more agency. For example, you could have the original syllabus grading scheme, a grading scheme that emphasizes pre-strike assessment and de-emphasizes post-strike assessments, and a grading scheme with fewer assignments (e.g., students can now drop 2 low grades or there will now only be 6 journals instead of 8).
• Communicate P/NC Option: Let them know the senate approved that “any student who receives a specific letter grade for a paused course can request that it be changed to a P/NC grade.” However, they should be mindful of what this might mean if the course is a requirement for future courses or degrees (e.g., some programs require specific grades, not just a pass).

5. Clear Communication

Communicate clearly to your students by creating a detailed document. Consider creating a document titled “Post-Strike Revised Schedule and Grading Plan” (you could also call this a proposed schedule and grading plan if you intend to seek their input or have them weigh in on the plan) and posting it to your course homepage and emailing it to students so they know where to find information about how the syllabus will be revised and what to expect once classes resume.